Oddly enough, I had a 152/1 once - game #13000 - see below. Not trying to brag about it, just posting for posterity. And I remember watersmooth_silver getting similar stats on a 9x2 in a British Open once, which was in my view even more impressive because a) it was under tournament conditions and b) you only get one chance per game in British Opens.
First game of the day - those black 2s were giving me a headache but it was one of those where you had to ignore them and go around the houses hoping something would open up later, and thankfully it did.
Game: | 6x4 11143-5 |
Game stats: | 80/1/1.3%/2308 |
Player Elo: | 2083.234 ▲ 6.378 |
Elapsed: | 11:17 |
Streak: | 3 |
Have had some nasty deals today, and this was another of them. Had the cursor hovering over the Quit button a few times.
Game: | 6x4 23550-5 |
Game stats: | 82/1/1.2%/2319 |
Player Elo: | 2092.475 ▲ 6.389 |
Elapsed: | 7:31 |
Streak: | 2 |
Today: | 2 |
The opening was easy enough, the staying focused was the hardest part.
Game: | 7x3 27442-5 |
Game stats: | 34/1/2.9%/1845 |
Player Elo: | 1725.777 ▲ 5.439 |
Elapsed: | 2:14 |
Streak: | 1 |
Today: | 4 |
Current: | 3 |
A bit surprised by the stats on this one.
Game: | W10x1 4200-8 |
Game stats: | 25/1/4%/2015 |
Player Elo: | 2144.988 ▲ 2.630 |
Elapsed: | 12:42 |
From the Threat, yummi won this game which was 0/29 when I got to it. At first glance it looks unwinnable but there is a way and I almost solved it myself afterwards. Congrats yummi for winning the Threat!
Game: | 7x3 30283-10 |
Game stats: | 33/1/3% |
Elo: | n/a |
Elapsed: | 7:30 |
Streak was: | n/a |
I always find the first contests games pretty hard
this one follow the rule. When I saw it first with all the aces buried, it was just a question of which one to choose first to free
Game: | 6x5 22709-5 |
Game stats: | 12/1/8.3%/1884 |
Got this one right at the start of a 6x5 All-in-One tournament:
2/16 | 15:35 | 6x5 31867-6 | Tournament | 2:23 | Won | 3.6% | 444 | 1 | 28 |
Quite some time ago (when I was much better at streaking than I am today), I went through all of the previously un-won 6x4-5 deals between 1-1000 to see how many I could knock off. At the end, I think there were something around 153 that still had zero wins so I figured that the percentage of winnable 6x4-5's was around 85%. This was much higher than had been previously mentioned on the discussion board. Well, thanks to using a solver, we now know that the actual percentage for 6x4-5's is almost 90% (89.77% to be exact). Recently, I started to go back and look at the deals that eluded me those many years back. I gave this one a shot and solved it first time:
Game: | 6x4 171-5 |
Game stats: | 109/1/0.9% |
Player Elo: | n/a |
Elapsed: | 2:34 |
I thought I had typed in the wrong game number given the time but it was clear by the stats it was correct.
Got it on replay: a surprisingly simple solution!
Game: | 10x0 32236-5 |
Game stats: | 19/1/5.3% |
Player Elo: | n/a |
Elapsed: | 2:43 |
Streak: | n/a |
All the stars were lined up for this one! No way!
Game: | 9x0 5050-5 |
Game stats: | 22/1/4.5%/2404 |
Player Elo: | 1730.936 ▲ 7.852 |
Elapsed: | 8:09 |
Streak: | 1 |
Congratulations kangaroo, that's a great win!! I've stopped playing 9x0 this year.
Nice going roo, makes all the pain and suffering disappear temporarily!
Thanks TT and Uberman. That must have been the highest Elo of any game I've won while streaking. (I don't keep track of that.)
Lost this game at 0/21 after an easy column clear. Finally found the obscure pathway.
Game: | 10x0 22122-5 |
Game stats: | 25/1/4% |
Player Elo: | n/a |
Elapsed: | 3:53 |
Streak: | n/a |
not very well paid...
You Win
Game: | 12x0 801-7 |
Game stats: | 40/1/2.5%/1347 |
"not very well paid..."
How does the prize money work? Is that why people are mad at Tony? : )
it's just a question of Elo, this game had the same Elo than the other games
5/5 | 16:29 | 12x0 801-7 | Streak | 6:59 | Won | 2.5% | 1347 | 1 | 40 |
5/5 | 16:22 | 12x0 19574-7 | Streak | 1:36 | Won | 85.7% | 1331 | 6 | 7 |
5/5 | 16:20 | 12x0 31793-7 | Streak | 2:32 | Won | 62.5% | 1452 | 10 | 16 |
I thought "paid" was some kind of autocorrect spelling error. I see what you mean now. Getting a .125 ELO boost when maybe it should have been 4 is pretty frustrating. Nice win regardless.